Manta BridgeWho performed the audit?
The public PDF identifies BlockSec as the audit contact and presents a report for the Fast Finality Network.
The fast-finality audit report is the source to read directly. It is separate from Manta's concept page, which explains the finality design and why the team wants to reduce withdrawal friction.
| Audit item | What can be stated | Status detail |
|---|---|---|
| Report identity | Public PDF for the Fast Finality Network, dated August 11, 2025, with BlockSec contact shown. | Confirmed from the report cover. |
| Reviewed area | The report covers fast-finality contract and network logic, including security issues, recommendations, and notes. | Qualitative summary only. |
| Severity counts | This page does not publish a count table because the safest source is the report's own findings section. | No invented totals. |
| Fix status | The PDF includes issue-level statuses such as fixed and partially fixed in Version 2. | Read each finding before relying on it. |
Were any high-severity issues found?
Do not rely on a secondary page for a high-severity count. Read the report findings directly because severity and status are recorded per issue.
The audit report's table of contents lists many finding entries and the body attaches severity and status labels to individual issues. To avoid overstating security, this page does not compress the report into an invented count. For background on the mechanism being audited, use the official fast-finality explainer.
Security posture is broader than one audit. Pair this page with Manta Pacific sequencer and force-transaction trust assumptions and whether Manta Bridge is safe.
Were the findings fixed?
The report includes per-finding status labels, including fixed and partially fixed entries, but users should read the PDF rather than relying on a simplified all-clear.
A finding marked fixed does not mean every operational or trust assumption disappears. Fast finality still has a documented design, validators, aggregation, and bridge-state interactions that users should understand before treating speed as the only decision factor.
For the withdrawal-mechanics view, read what changed in Manta Pacific fast finality and withdrawal mechanics.
Verify the audit at source: use this page as a map, then open the PDF and Manta Bridge before making a security judgment about fast finality.
Open BridgeWas Manta Pacific's fast finality feature audited?
Yes. Manta publishes a public fast-finality audit report PDF. The report should be read directly for exact scope, findings, severity labels, and statuses because secondary summaries can easily overcompress the security details.
Who performed the audit?
The public PDF identifies BlockSec contact information and is titled as a report for the Fast Finality Network. This page uses that PDF as the audit source rather than inferring auditor identity from unrelated announcements.
Were any high-severity issues found?
This page does not state a high-severity count because the reliable source is the audit report itself. The report records severity and status at the finding level, so users should check the findings section directly.
Were the findings fixed?
The report includes per-finding status labels, including fixed and partially fixed entries. Because status can vary by issue, it is more accurate to read the PDF than to treat the audit as a single yes-or-no result.
Where can I read the audit report myself?
You can read the audit report in the public PDF hosted on docs.manta.network under the fast-finality audit-report asset URL. Use the PDF for exact finding names, severity labels, statuses, and any auditor clarifications.